Red Deer Spends Ottawa’s First $3 Million And Keeps Its Zoning

Alberta Tribune
Alberta Tribune is an independent Alberta new media and opinion publication based in Calgary. This is the editorial desk byline, used for reporting and commentary produced...
7 Min Read
Photo by Josh Olalde on Unsplash

On September 15, 2026, Red Deer City Council approved a budget amendment that sends $2,938,682 to a permanent supportive housing financial incentive grant and $150,000 to a new housing strategy. The City of Red Deer will issue a request for proposals so qualified housing providers can apply, and the number of units will follow from the bids it receives. The money is federal, the first payment under a Housing Accelerator Fund agreement that Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation cancelled in January. The zoning rule that ended that agreement is still not part of Red Deer’s bylaws.

The decision is small in dollars. The documents behind it are worth reading closely, because they show how a federal program with a stated purpose of building more homes came to stop paying for homes in a city that says it needs them.

Key facts

  • The City of Red Deer states it was awarded $12 million through the second round of the federal Housing Accelerator Fund in February 2025 and received a first payment of $3 million in 2025.
  • Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation announced on January 16, 2026 that Red Deer’s Housing Accelerator Fund agreement was cancelled effective that day, after the city was found non-compliant with mandatory program requirements as of July 21, 2025.
  • A Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation release of July 8, 2024 stated that applicants in the large and urban stream of the fund’s second round were required to commit to four units as-of-right bylaws.
  • Red Deer City Council approved $2,938,682 for a permanent supportive housing financial incentive grant and $150,000 for a housing strategy on September 15, 2026, according to the City of Red Deer.

What the federal agreement asked Red Deer to do

The City’s own program page lists eight initiatives in the original action plan. Seven of them were things the City would fund or change itself, including a Dollars for Doors incentive, permanent supportive housing incentives, land disposition, process improvements, transit proximity changes and an updated housing strategy. The eighth was the condition the City describes as “a federal requirement for The City to allow up to four residential units as-of-right on residential properties.” As-of-right meant an owner could build up to four units on a lot without a rezoning or a public consultation for the additional units.

On July 21, 2025, council decided not to proceed with a blanket zoning change to allow four units as-of-right. The federal release that cancelled the agreement dates Red Deer’s non-compliance to July 21, 2025. It is the same day, which tells a reader exactly what the program measured.

- Advertisement -

Why one zoning condition ended the whole agreement

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s January release says the fund “helps increase the supply of housing by cutting red tape and reducing local barriers to housing,” while the agreement, in the City’s summary of it, turned on “a federal requirement for The City to allow up to four residential units as-of-right.” The first sentence describes an outcome, which is more homes. The second describes an instrument, which is a bylaw. The program judged compliance by the instrument.

The consequence of that design shows in the same January release. Toronto’s funding was reduced by $10 million and Vaughan’s by $7.4 million for commitments not fully met, while Red Deer’s agreement was cancelled outright, because its missed item was classed as mandatory. A program that can reduce a grant for one missed commitment and cancel another for a different missed item has written two kinds of obligation into its agreements, and the difference between them decides the whole amount. By our count from the City’s list, the supportive housing incentive that council has now funded was one of the seven initiatives that fell with the eighth.

The terms were public before Red Deer signed, and council took its zoning decision knowing the condition. The objection here is to the drafting. An agreement meant to add homes should be able to tell a delivered supportive housing unit from a bylaw that was not passed, and this one could not.

What the $2.9 million now buys and who decides

The City says it has since confirmed that it can keep and use the $3 million already received. Council’s two lines total $3,088,682 by our arithmetic, slightly more than the $3 million first payment the City’s program page describes, and the September 15 release does not explain the difference. The same program page now names two remaining initiatives, the development of 25 permanent supportive housing units and a housing strategy that takes in missing-middle housing, while the September 15 release leaves the unit count to the request for proposals. If the grant does fund 25 units, it works out to about $117,547 a unit by our arithmetic.

Mayor Cindy Jefferies put the scale of it in one line in the City’s release: “every additional home matters.” The figure that matters to Red Deer is the one the release does not state. By our arithmetic, $12 million less the $3 million already paid leaves about $9 million of the February 2025 agreement that will never arrive under this program. Across the province, the slowdown in Alberta housing starts after three record years gives each of those unpaid dollars more weight than it would have carried in 2024.

- Advertisement -

Housing providers will bid for the $2,938,682 once the City issues its request for proposals. The remaining $9 million will not be paid to Red Deer under this agreement, and residential lots in Red Deer stay under the zoning council kept on July 21, 2025.

Frequently asked questions

Why was Red Deer’s Housing Accelerator Fund agreement cancelled?

Red Deer was awarded $12 million through the fund’s second round in February 2025 and received a first payment of $3 million that year. On July 21, 2025, council voted not to proceed with a blanket zoning change to allow up to four residential units as-of-right, which the program required. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation dated the city’s non-compliance to that same day and cancelled the agreement effective Jan. 16, 2026, since the missed item was classed as mandatory.

What does four units as-of-right zoning mean?

It means a property owner could build up to four units on a residential lot without a rezoning or a public consultation for the additional units. The City of Red Deer’s own program page describes it as a federal requirement of the agreement. Council decided against the blanket change on July 21, 2025, and residential lots in Red Deer stay under the zoning council kept that day.

How much of the federal housing money did Red Deer keep?

The City has confirmed it can keep and use the $3 million already received. On Sept. 15, 2026, council approved $2,938,682 for a permanent supportive housing financial incentive grant and $150,000 for a new housing strategy, which totals $3,088,682, slightly more than the first payment, a difference the September release does not explain. By the Tribune’s arithmetic, $12 million less the $3 million paid leaves about $9 million of the February 2025 agreement that will never arrive under this program.

What will the Red Deer supportive housing money buy?

The City will issue a request for proposals so qualified housing providers can apply for the $2,938,682 incentive grant, with the unit count following from the bids. The city’s program page names 25 permanent supportive housing units as the target; if the grant does fund 25 units, it works out to about $117,547 a unit. The second line, $150,000, funds a housing strategy that takes in missing-middle housing.

- Advertisement -

Were other cities penalized under the Housing Accelerator Fund?

Yes. Under the same January release, Toronto’s funding was reduced by $10 million and Vaughan’s by $7.4 million for commitments not fully met. The difference between a reduced grant and a cancelled agreement sat in how the program classed each missed item: Red Deer’s missed four-unit bylaw was classed as mandatory, so the whole agreement was cancelled rather than cut.

Share This Article
Follow:
Alberta Tribune is an independent Alberta new media and opinion publication based in Calgary. This is the editorial desk byline, used for reporting and commentary produced by the newsroom on Alberta politics, energy and pipelines, business, infrastructure, agriculture, artificial intelligence and provincial public policy.
Leave a Comment